<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it time to ignore 800 by 600 Resolution yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/</link>
	<description>Commentary by Sadish on WordPress and his Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Address Finder</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-4854</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Address Finder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 04:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-4854</guid>
		<description>If the website I&#039;m building doesn&#039;t require much width I try to stick to 800x600 designs but since I see that only 1% of visitors across my websites are still using 800x600 I tend to use 900 - 960px width.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the website I&#8217;m building doesn&#8217;t require much width I try to stick to 800&#215;600 designs but since I see that only 1% of visitors across my websites are still using 800&#215;600 I tend to use 900 &#8211; 960px width.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lee</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>mobile browsers would become greatly popular in the next few years,:-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mobile browsers would become greatly popular in the next few years,:-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>there would be a great demand for mobile browsers in the coming years that is for sure.:;&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there would be a great demand for mobile browsers in the coming years that is for sure.:;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mory</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2918</link>
		<dc:creator>Mory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2918</guid>
		<description>Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks <img src='http://wprocks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadish</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>It is not that I disregard people&#039;s comments for a bigger resolution. I just did not think I could make justice to the MistyLook theme&#039;s looks if I adjust its size.
I will definitely create new themes that are good for 1024x768 resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not that I disregard people&#8217;s comments for a bigger resolution. I just did not think I could make justice to the MistyLook theme&#8217;s looks if I adjust its size.<br />
I will definitely create new themes that are good for 1024&#215;768 resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mory</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>Mory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>hi dear sadish , lots of comments about making a 1024x768 px but you didn&#039;t work on new res :/
if you don&#039;t want to do that please make a css mode for us or tell us how to edit mistylook theme to convert to 1024 px 
nobody use 800x600 monitor now , and most of the links in these kind of themes are breaked to two line and that make blog awful , also images have higher res that before and you can&#039;t use more than 510 px width in post :/
hope you hear and ask your theme fans ;)
best wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi dear sadish , lots of comments about making a 1024&#215;768 px but you didn&#8217;t work on new res :/<br />
if you don&#8217;t want to do that please make a css mode for us or tell us how to edit mistylook theme to convert to 1024 px<br />
nobody use 800&#215;600 monitor now , and most of the links in these kind of themes are breaked to two line and that make blog awful , also images have higher res that before and you can&#8217;t use more than 510 px width in post :/<br />
hope you hear and ask your theme fans <img src='http://wprocks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
best wishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todor Lazov</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>Todor Lazov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>I use MistyLook on my site which is optimized for 800x600. One could easily agree that 800x600 is a very outdated resolution -- everyone uses 1024x768+ or 1280x800+ widescreen nowadays (Mine is 1440x900). However I think that with all the handheld and embedded devices that are beginning to flood the market they could easily produce a 5% share of all the visits -- think of iPhones, Nokia Internet tablets, even the newest generation smartphones have a 800x480 resolution - a resolution which in my opinion won&#039;t increase because of the physical limits, even if the resolution increases further we would still experience a wave of DPI increase -- an effect which we are already beginning to observe on notebook computers -- you can&#039;t read text normally on a 14&quot; TFT at full HD resolution and 96 DPI...
What I&#039;m trying to say is, the increase in resolution in a screen with a fixed physical size over time might actually be directly proportional to the DPI.
Since most people are more comfortable reading larger text, most of them would increase the DPI, say form 96 to 125/128 which would make the font size larger. To give a concrete example of the situation -- A website viewed on a 1440x900 resolution with 128 DPI is approx. 200 pixels narrower than the same site viewed with the same resolution but with the default 96 DPI.
My vote is not for completely abandoning the 800x600 resolution - it will still be used in one way or another. A very elegant solution to this problem would be to drop the sidebar below all the posts when the screen resolution is low or the browser window is resized -- the main wordpress.com site used to do this with the tags sidebar through a complex CSS coding - no javascript -- just using fixed sizes and percentages. This way users with lower resolution were still able to open the website and enjoy it without a horizontal scroll. Good luck and keep the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use MistyLook on my site which is optimized for 800&#215;600. One could easily agree that 800&#215;600 is a very outdated resolution &#8212; everyone uses 1024&#215;768+ or 1280&#215;800+ widescreen nowadays (Mine is 1440&#215;900). However I think that with all the handheld and embedded devices that are beginning to flood the market they could easily produce a 5% share of all the visits &#8212; think of iPhones, Nokia Internet tablets, even the newest generation smartphones have a 800&#215;480 resolution &#8211; a resolution which in my opinion won&#8217;t increase because of the physical limits, even if the resolution increases further we would still experience a wave of DPI increase &#8212; an effect which we are already beginning to observe on notebook computers &#8212; you can&#8217;t read text normally on a 14&#8243; TFT at full HD resolution and 96 DPI&#8230;<br />
What I&#8217;m trying to say is, the increase in resolution in a screen with a fixed physical size over time might actually be directly proportional to the DPI.<br />
Since most people are more comfortable reading larger text, most of them would increase the DPI, say form 96 to 125/128 which would make the font size larger. To give a concrete example of the situation &#8212; A website viewed on a 1440&#215;900 resolution with 128 DPI is approx. 200 pixels narrower than the same site viewed with the same resolution but with the default 96 DPI.<br />
My vote is not for completely abandoning the 800&#215;600 resolution &#8211; it will still be used in one way or another. A very elegant solution to this problem would be to drop the sidebar below all the posts when the screen resolution is low or the browser window is resized &#8212; the main wordpress.com site used to do this with the tags sidebar through a complex CSS coding &#8211; no javascript &#8212; just using fixed sizes and percentages. This way users with lower resolution were still able to open the website and enjoy it without a horizontal scroll. Good luck and keep the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vapprel</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>vapprel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>800 x 600 design is ok,but i will try 1024 x 768 in my blogs.
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>800 x 600 design is ok,but i will try 1024 x 768 in my blogs.<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liveon</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>liveon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>I think there is no necessity to design for 800 x 600 any more and start designing  1024 x 768
Keep up the great work Sadish 
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is no necessity to design for 800 x 600 any more and start designing  1024 x 768<br />
Keep up the great work Sadish<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al3loo</title>
		<link>http://wprocks.com/design-thoughts/is-it-time-to-ignore-800-by-600-resolution-yet/comment-page-2/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>Al3loo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprocks.com/?p=326#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>Hi !

I came to this page while I was searching .. ^-^
I think the best designer who makes his design flexible to all people, and with all resolution and browsers.

So your site will be the confluence for all people.
Also, I think this resolution (800 * 600) is very small to see all the page clearly!




Thats what I thougt ! nice site &amp;
Best Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi !</p>
<p>I came to this page while I was searching .. ^-^<br />
I think the best designer who makes his design flexible to all people, and with all resolution and browsers.</p>
<p>So your site will be the confluence for all people.<br />
Also, I think this resolution (800 * 600) is very small to see all the page clearly!</p>
<p>Thats what I thougt ! nice site &amp;<br />
Best Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

